Align engineering work to
business outcomes.
Alignment ranks every objective by the performance it actually received, month by month and repo by repo, then flags the ones running past their target date. It is the honest answer to the question every leadership meeting eventually asks: “Are we actually on track?”
Objectives
How your work aligns to strategic objectives over time · all contributors · 12 months.
- Checkout redesign
- Enterprise SSO
- Self-serve onboarding
- Cut p99 latency
- SOC 2 Type II
- Search relevance
- Other (13)
| Objective | Status | Share | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checkout redesign | Active | 32% | 144.0ETV |
| Enterprise SSO | Started | 20% | 88.0ETV |
| Self-serve onboarding | Active | 16% | 72.0ETV |
| Cut p99 latency | Completed | 14% | 64.0ETV |
| SOC 2 Type II | Active | 10% | 44.0ETV |
| Search relevance | Active | 0% | 1.4ETV |
| Other (13) | Active | 8% | 34.4ETV |
From commits to priorities, with no self-reports in between.
Navigara reads every commit, classifies the intent, and tags the priority it actually moved. Then it cross-checks the issue tracker to surface what shipped without ever being tracked.
The signal you walk into the boardroom with comes directly from the repo. Nothing passed through a standup claim on the way there.
Your code never leaves your servers. We measure outcomes, not activity.
Which objectives are about to miss.
Every objective carries a status and a target date. Navigara groups them by delivery risk, so the ones about to slip surface while there is still time to move people. Completed objectives drop out of the view. An objective sitting at almost no performance is flagged too, because a named objective nobody is building is the failure nobody reports.
Grouped by delivery risk from status and target date. Completed objectives are hidden.
- Checkout redesign144.0ETVTarget Jul 31, 2026
- Search relevance1.4ETVTarget Jun 26, 2026
- Enterprise SSO88.0ETVTarget Aug 21, 2026
- Self-serve onboarding72.0ETVTarget Sep 30, 2026
- SOC 2 Type II44.0ETVTarget Aug 31, 2026
- Other (13)34.4ETVNo target date
Pick a feature. See what kind of work it actually cost.
Features cost time, and every engineering leader knows this. What most have never seen is what kind of time: growth, maintenance, or fixes, and how that split has changed quarter over quarter without anyone calling it out.
Drag the slider through history and watch the shape change. The first time you run this on a live feature, you will see something you suspected and could not prove until now.
- Growth, maintenance, and fixes per feature
- Retroactive across the feature's full history
- Compare features against each other and against the org average
- Surface features quietly bleeding the team
- Growthnew capabilities, surfaces, integrations62%+8pp
- Maintenancerefactors, dependency upgrades, infra28%-5pp
- Fixesbugs, regressions, edge cases10%-3pp
vs. Q4 2025 baseline · click any row to see contributing PRs
What you can walk into a room and say on Monday.
- Walk in with the performance each objective actually received, not the share estimated in the planning doc
- Tell the CEO which objectives got the output and which got almost none, and back it with the PRs behind every number
- Name the three initiatives that will miss their target date, while there is still time to move people
- Show how much of the quarter was maintenance and fixes rather than growth, per objective
- Run a quarterly retro on what shipped, not on how people felt about what shipped
Run alignment
on your data.
Connect your repos. Name your objectives. Navigara measures who shipped what against them, month by month, and flags what is about to miss.
If the numbers surprise you, we should talk.