Align engineering work to
business outcomes.
Alignment measures, in performance, how much each team contributed to each priority. Week by week, repo by repo. The honest answer to “are we on track.”
AI copilot
5 teams contributing · started Jan 14, 2026 · 12 weeks of signal.
| Team | Avg share | Δ first → last |
|---|---|---|
| Search | 8.6% | +2.8pp |
| Identity | 5.5% | +6.5pp |
| Payments | 6% | +1pp |
| Infra | 4.8% | -4.5pp |
| Mobile | 2.2% | 0pp |
From commits to priorities. No self-reports in between.
Read every commit. Classify intent. Tag the priority it actually moved. Cross-check the issue tracker. The signal you walk into the boardroom with is the signal that came out of the repo.
Your code never leaves your servers. We measure outcomes, not activity.
Every team. Every priority. Every week.
The CEO names the priorities. Navigara measures who’s pulling weight.
Pick a priority. See how much of each team’s performance went to it this quarter, broken down by week. Drift is visible. Trade-offs are visible. The team you thought was on the AI copilot but actually spent six weeks on infra cleanup is visible.
Every signal is derived from what shipped. Not what was claimed in standup.
- Performance share against each priority, by team
- Weekly granularity, quarter over quarter
- Drill into any cell to see the underlying PRs
- Compare against last quarter or against the team's own forecast
Pick a feature. See where its performance went.
Features have shapes. The shape is hidden by default.
Growth, maintenance, or fixes. Most leaders have never seen this breakdown. They know features cost time. They have not seen what kind of time.
Drag the slider through history. Watch the shape change quarter over quarter. The first time you do this, you will see something you suspected and could not prove.
- Growth, maintenance, fixes per feature
- Retroactive across the feature's full history
- Compare features against each other and against the org average
- Surface features quietly bleeding the team
- Growthnew capabilities, surfaces, integrations62%+8pp
- Maintenancerefactors, dependency upgrades, infra28%-5pp
- Fixesbugs, regressions, edge cases10%-3pp
vs. Q4 2025 baseline · click any row to see contributing PRs
Monday morning. Things you can do that you couldn’t on Friday.
- Walk into the board with the share each priority got. The actual share, not the narrative
- Tell the CEO the AI copilot got 11% of org performance and you need 25%. Defensibly
- Catch a team drifting into maintenance two weeks in. Not two months in
- Run a quarterly retro on numbers, not vibes
Run alignment
on your data.
Connect your repos. Name your priorities. We measure who shipped what against them, week by week.
If the numbers surprise you, we should talk.