Navigate The
AI transformation.
Built by CTOs who got tired of guessing.
Let data lead the conversation.
AI Transformation Results - Year over Year
Engineering performance grew 128% since Q1'25 → Headcount grew 28% (34 devs).
Engineering headcount
+0%
121 → 155 YoY.
Total Performance vs Headcount
Total Performance (left axis, solid) vs Headcount (right axis, dashed). Labels show Total Performance (ETV) change vs Q1'25 baseline.
Total Performance [ETV]Headcount
Performance is measured through the lens of a Senior Engineer: analyzing the story of each PR by LLMs, ML, and Algorithms . More at research.navigara.com.
How is your AI transformation going?
We're here to give you answers you can act on.
Q·01
Is Copilot worth $240K/year?
Usage stats are not equivalent to business impact.
Asked byCFO
Signalseat usage
Gap→business impact
Q·02
Which teams deliver the most value?
Multiple teams and agencies all claim high productivity. No comparable signals.
Asked byCTO
Signalself-report
Gap→comparable output
Q·03
Are we shipping faster than last year?
New AI tools, new headcount, no baseline. No data to prove the progress.
Asked byCEO
Signalactivity totals
Gap→YoY progress
Grounded in research.Navigara’s measurement engine powers the OSS Performance white paper, a study of repositories across multiple AI-forward organizations.
EDGE
Cloudflare
FRAMEWORKS
Vercel
PLATFORM
Google
RUNTIME
Meta
FRONTIER
OpenAI
DEVTOOLS
Microsoft
Navigara
Performance
See how engineering performance changes month over month, and the signals that explain why.
Work mix
Performance is split into Growth (New value), Maintenance, and Fixes so leaders see direction.
Benchmark
Teams' per-quarter trajectory placed alongside other relevant organizations.
Performance
+116%
Avg. Developer Performance YoY
Growth
29% → 36%
Growth · +7pp shift YoY
Maintenance
56% → 46%
Maintenance · -10pp shift YoY
Fixes
15% → 18%
Fixes · +3pp shift YoY
Five things you can do on Monday morning.
Prove AI is working.
Benchmark team, developer, or AI agent performance year over year. See exactly what the new tools changed.
- Year over Year comparisons, normalized for headcount
- Drill into any team, repo, or individual developer
- Deliver board-ready charts that showcase progress
benchmarking · navigara.app
Avg. Developer Performance · YoY
Performance per developer per quarter, calculated from commit complexity, architecture changes, and deployment impact. Full methodology here →
See how to improve performance.
Real-time view into what's happening across engineering: new tools, new processes, new patterns. Implement what's working, faster.
- Anonymized adoption data from 200+ engineering teams
- Weekly digest on what your peers shipped this week
pulse · live.navigara.app
Industry pulse · This week
liveCursor 0.9+14pt
Adoption +14pt among Series B+ orgs
42 of 84 sampled · last 7 days
Linear M−31%
Stacked PR workflow rolled out at 12 cos.
Median cycle time dropped 31%
Claude C.+29pt
Auto-review now active in 38% of repos
Up from 9% three months ago
Trunk-only1.6×
Single-branch teams ship 1.6× more
Controlled for team size
Read unbiased reporting about your engineering.
Weekly, monthly, and quarterly reports on what your teams are actually doing: adoption rates, stories, tool usage, and spend.
- Share via PDF, Notion, or Google Slides
- Audit trail with raw signals behind every metric
- No vibes, no proxies, no team self-reports
Q1-2026-Board-Pack.pdf
Section 03 · Engineering output · Q1 2026
+0%
vs. Q1 2025 baseline
Per-developer performance improved across most teams this quarter, with fixes/bugs holding steady. Growth dipped after senior attrition.
Average developer performance, by team
ETV per developer per week · Q1'25 baseline vs Q1'26
Q1'25Q1'26
Platform
4.27.2
+71%Payments
5.08.1
+62%API
3.85.6
+47%Mobile
4.56.5
+44%Search
4.86.4
+33%Growth
4.65.0
−8%02468
Set performance-based targets.
Every quarter, peer companies ship faster. We benchmark your team against your peer cohort in real time, then move your targets up to keep pace. The bar isn't where you were, it's where they are.
- Targets re-indexed weekly against your peer cohort's actual output
- See exactly how fast the curve is moving and where you sit on it
- Slack alerts when the cohort accelerates and your team falls behind
targets · q2-2026.navigara.app
Targets · Q2 2026
Indexed against your peer cohort · updated weekly
cohort live
Your teamPeer median↑Curve moved this quarter
Performance
peer ↑ +6% Q1→Q2
peer 7.8
AI adoption
peer ↑ +14% Q1→Q2
peer 75%
Cycle time
peer ↓ −9% Q1→Q2
peer 12h
Fixes
peer ↓ −8% Q1→Q2
peer 22%
Ask in Slack. Get an answer.
Native Slack & MS Teams interface. Get objective aswers to your questions in real-time.
- Natural language across every metric, team, and timeframe
- Citations link back to raw activity for verification
- Schedule recurring questions as Slack digests
Your data, your environment, your rules.
Three deployment models. Pick the one that matches your security.
01
Cloud SaaS
Fully managed. No infrastructure needed. Data is processed and stored in Navigara's cloud. Connect your sources, get insights in minutes.
02
Cloud SaaS with on-prem collector
SaaS frontend and API with a collector agent inside your network. Source code stays within your perimeter; only metadata and analysis results are sent to the cloud. Docs →
03
Full on-premises
All components deployed inside your infrastructure. Complete data sovereignty with no external dependencies. For regulated environments and air-gapped networks. Docs →
04
SSO, SCIM, and audit logs in every mode
SAML / OIDC via Okta, Entra, or Google. Role-based access for execs, managers, and ICs. Every read is logged and exportable.
What leaves your perimeter
per deployment
Cloud SaaS
Source + metadata in Navigara cloud
Fully managed · fastest to value · SOC 2 Type II
SaaS + Collector
Only metadata + analysis results
Source code never leaves your network · collector runs inside VPC
Full on-prem
Nothing leaves. At all.
Helm + Terraform · air-gap supported · BYO storage and identity
Compliance
SOC 2 · GDPR · ISO 27001 (Q3 '26)
DPA on request · sub-processor list public
# on-prem collector · what's emitted
commit.metadata ✓ shape, author, timestamps
review.activity ✓ approvals, comments
analysis.scores ✓ ETV per developer
source.code ✗ stays in your network
secrets / .env ✗ never read
→ residency: your VPC / your region
Map engineering work to business outcomes.
Every dollar of engineering output tied to a company goal. Navigara traces every commit to the initiatives that matter, then quantifies the throughput in dollars per priority. Every team, every week. The black box is now your ledger.
Commits
team-backend213team-frontend270team-platform245+ 5 more
Navigara processing
Architect
Maps changes to features
Classification
Tags intent and work type
Performance
Complexity, engagement
Commit story
What changed and why
JIRA cross-check
Was this work tracked in the issue tracker — or did it ship as ghost work?
Key aligned
Strategic, tracked
Aligned
Tracked, low priority
Unaligned
Ghost work
Repository story
+ 42 devs·Every team, every dev, one timeline
Result
4 priorities the org owns
Time and performance per signal — every team, every repo.
Your history,
reconstructed.
Navigara reads back through your history and sets a performance baseline. Get reports about your engineering progress, CapEx and OpEx included.
Q2 2024
Q3 2024
Q4 2024
Q1 2025
Q2 2025
Q3 2025
Q4 2025
Q1 2026
TToday
Releases
Merges
Commits