BuildMeasureScale

The performance layer for AI-native engineering.

Measure engineering before and after AI, tie it to revenue, and fix what slipped.

Start free trial

Trusted by engineering teams

Kiwi.comFinshapePartners BankaPurple TechnologyGreysonItrinityESETFTMOkegg

Three numbers to know if AI tools are performing

Performance

How much faster is my team?

Value shipped per developer, and how much it has changed over the last 90 days.

Performance: 16.2
16.2ETV / dev / mo90-day trend +18%
Target15 ETV
Performance per developer
AI Spend

How many tokens does that gain cost?

What one unit of shipped value costs you in AI spend. Lower is better.

AI Spend: $242
$242per 1 ETV90-day trend +8%
Target$200
AI spend per ETV
Roadmap Alignment

Is that performance on the roadmap?

How much of that shipped value lands on roadmap priorities, not just volume.

Roadmap Alignment: 51%
51%align with roadmap90-day trend −11%
Target75%
Align with roadmap
Unaligned

Five things you can do on Monday morning.

Prove your AI ROI.

Measure engineering before and after AI, then tie the speed to the roadmap, and the roadmap to revenue.

  • Year-over-year performance, normalized for headcount
  • Drill into any team, repo, developer, or AI agent
  • Board-ready reports, scored from commit history, not surveys
Explore AI ROI
benchmarking · navigara.app
Avg. Developer Performance · YoY
Performance per developer per quarter, calculated from commit complexity, architecture changes, and deployment impact. Full methodology here →
ETV12840baseline · 5 ETVbase−21%+20%+77%+128%Q1'25Q2'25Q3'25Q4'25Q1'26

Put your best consultant on it. Every night.

A one-off audit costs six figures and is stale the week the consultants leave. Every night an agent reads your tickets, your commits and your AI spend, then flags where your own standards were ignored. Close the findings and your ETV climbs.

  • Defaults codified with the engineering leaders and fractional CTOs who fix this for a living
  • Every finding carries a severity, a location and an owner
  • Every rule, severity and threshold is yours to overwrite
Explore Checks
checks · navigara.app
Nightly run · 12 weeks in97 resolved
  • HighCommit unrelated to its ticketResolved
  • WarningRubber-stamp reviewResolved
  • WarningEpic with no expected returnOpen
  • InfoToken spend with no deliveryOpen
Open findings12427
ETV / dev / mo9.414.1

Align your engineering to the roadmap.

Only 49% of last quarter's output landed on a named objective. Roadmap alignment ranks every objective by the performance it actually received, breaks out the unaligned work, and flags the initiatives running past their target date.

  • Every objective ranked by the performance it actually received, in ETV
  • Unaligned work broken out, so scope churn is visible mid-quarter
  • Drill into any number to see the PRs it was built from
Explore Alignment
objectives · navigara.app
Objective alignment · 12 months49% aligned
  • Checkout redesignActive144.0ETV
  • Billing platform v2Completed42.8ETV
  • Mobile app redesignStarted39.0ETV
  • SOC 2 Type IIActive23.6ETV
  • Search relevanceActive1.4ETV
Aligned447.9ETV
Unplanned466.1ETV
Overdue3

Read unbiased reporting about your engineering.

Weekly, monthly, and quarterly reports on what your teams are actually doing: adoption rates, stories, tool usage, and spend.

  • Share via PDF, Notion, or Google Slides
  • Audit trail with raw signals behind every metric
  • No vibes, no proxies, no team self-reports
Q1-2026-Board-Pack.pdf
Section 03 · Engineering output · Q1 2026
+0%
vs. Q1 2025 baseline
Per-developer performance improved across most teams this quarter, with fixes/bugs holding steady. Growth dipped after senior attrition.
Average developer performance, by team
ETV per developer per week · Q1'25 baseline vs Q1'26
Q1'25Q1'26
Platform
4.27.2
+71%
Payments
5.08.1
+62%
API
3.85.6
+47%
Mobile
4.56.5
+44%
Search
4.86.4
+33%
Growth
4.65.0
−8%
02468

Ask in Slack. Get an answer.

Native Slack & MS Teams interface. Get objective answers to your questions in real-time.

  • Natural language across every metric, team, and timeframe
  • Citations link back to raw activity for verification
  • Schedule recurring questions as Slack digests
Slack · navigara-app
#eng-leadership42 members
AS
Jensen Huang10:42 AM
@navigara what did the Platform team ship last week?
AS
Jensen Huang10:43 AM
how much unaligned work did we detect this sprint, and what?
AS
Jensen Huang10:45 AM
what would most improve the Search team's performance?
N
/navigara

As featured in

ForbesWiredYahoo FinanceVentureBeatGeekWireSF WeeklyCzechCrunch
See all coverage

Your data, your environment, your rules.

Three deployment models. Pick the one that matches your security.

01
Cloud SaaS
Fully managed. No infrastructure needed. Data is processed and stored in Navigara's cloud. Connect your sources, get insights in minutes.
02
Cloud SaaS with on-prem collector
SaaS frontend and API with a collector agent inside your network. Source code stays within your perimeter; only metadata and analysis results are sent to the cloud. Docs →
03
Full on-premises
All components deployed inside your infrastructure. Complete data sovereignty with no external dependencies. For regulated environments and air-gapped networks. Docs →
04
SSO, SCIM, and audit logs in every mode
SAML / OIDC via Okta, Entra, or Google. Role-based access for execs, managers, and ICs. Every read is logged and exportable.
What leaves your perimeter
per deployment
Cloud SaaS
Source + metadata in Navigara cloud
Fully managed · fastest to value · SOC 2 Type II
SaaS + Collector
Only metadata + analysis results
Source code never leaves your network · collector runs inside VPC
Full on-prem
Nothing leaves. At all.
Helm + Terraform · air-gap supported · BYO storage and identity
Compliance
SOC 2 · GDPR · ISO 27001 (Q3 '26)
DPA on request · sub-processor list public
# on-prem collector · what's emitted
commit.metadata shape, author, timestamps
review.activity approvals, comments
analysis.scores ETV per developer
source.code     stays in your network
secrets / .env never read
→ residency: your VPC / your region

Map engineering work to business outcomes.

Every dollar of engineering output tied to a company goal. Navigara traces every commit to the initiatives that matter, then quantifies the throughput in dollars per priority. Every team, every week. The black box is now your ledger.

Your history,
reconstructed.

Navigara reads back through your history and sets a performance baseline. Get reports about your engineering progress, CapEx and OpEx included.

Q2 2024
Q3 2024
Q4 2024
Q1 2025
Q2 2025
Q3 2025
Q4 2025
Q1 2026
T
Releases
Merges
Commits

Grounded in research.Navigara’s measurement engine powers the OSS Performance white paper, a study of repositories across multiple AI-forward organizations.

Navigara
Performance
See how engineering performance changes month over month, and the signals that explain why.
Work mix
Performance is split into Growth (New value), Maintenance, and Fixes so leaders see direction.
Benchmark
Teams' per-quarter trajectory placed alongside other relevant organizations.
Performance
+116%
Avg. Developer Performance YoY
Growth (New value)
+7pp
Growth · 29% → 36% shift YoY
Maintenance
-10pp
Maintenance · 56% → 46% shift YoY
Fixes
+3pp
Fixes · 15% → 18% shift YoY
Read the white paperFull methodology →OSS-EPR · v1.0 · 2026-04-30

Lead engineering with data.

Your team is performing. Time to prove it.

Start free trial